I don’t understand this English question and need help to study.
1. Among the damages that can be awarded to a successful plaintiff are compensatory, consequential and punitive. Briefly define each.
2. In the clip below from the movie A Civil Action the narrator describes the “perfect plaintiff.” Clearly his view, as troubling as it sounds, is in the context of the amount of damages potentially awarded by a jury. What reasoning might support his claim that a deceased child is worth less than a 40-year-old male at the height of his earning potential?
3. Also controversial is the awarding of high-dollar punitive damages. In one case a jury awarded $75 million in punitive damages to a man who blamed Bayer AG’s glyphosate-based weed killer, Roundup, for his cancer. A judge reduced the punitive damages to $20 million. Was $75 million too much? How about $20 million? Why do you think the award was reduced? Should it have been reduced? Explain.
Here’s a link to a Round Up article: https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-slashes-punitive-damages-award-by-50-million-in-roundup-cancer-case/
REMEMBER: You are not sending out a text message or tweet, so when writing your post, use proper English, grammar and writing mechanics. Make sure you include what you think about the respective section you are discussing.
You will post to the forum by providing some background information followed up by your thoughts and opinions on the respective topic. It must be substantive and thoughtful dialogue. When appropriate, use outside sources such as the news, Internet, popular media, your textbook, journal articles, etc…to assist you here. Make sure to cite your work if applicable